For Founders · CMOs · CEOs · ECDs · MDs
Explore the approach →WMUH enters before the brief. Using creativity not as a production tool but as a reading instrument. Films, narratives, cultural observations that make visible what strategy documents rarely surface. The kind of clarity that comes not from more data, but from someone who knows how to look.
You leave with two things: a precise understanding of what has changed, and a creative direction your teams can act on immediately.
“Fabien helped us see a cultural shift we could feel but couldn't yet articulate. The insight became the foundation of the platform and shaped how we thought about Tinder's role in people's lives.”
Marketing Team, Tinder UK See the case →In 2023, Tinder UK was positioned around a simple insight: dating had become less about finding someone and more about understanding yourself. Two years later, Match Group CEO Spencer Rascoff publicly called for a cultural reset to address the same shift.
The value of the work wasn't in predicting the future. It was in recognising a cultural change while it was still taking shape, and turning that understanding into a direction the business could act on before the industry had found the language to describe it.
For years, companies learned to optimise their communication. Produce faster. Measure more precisely. Occupy more space. But something has slowly deteriorated. The connection between brands and the human reality of the cultures they speak to.
Culture changes much faster than the systems built to analyse it. So brands compensate. More content, more platforms, more presence. But the more they produce to stay visible, the more they become invisible.
Artificial intelligence didn't create this problem. It accelerated a system already incapable of slowing down.
Culture is read before anything is decided. When creativity operates upstream, it doesn't decorate strategy. It predicts it.
How I arrived at that conclusion is what the rest of this site is about.
Twenty years between London, New York and Paris, at the intersection of creativity, culture and brand. Samsung, Maybelline New York, Becca Cosmetics, L'Oréal Garnier, Tinder, Adobe, Mondelez.
But what brought me here isn't a professional trajectory. It's having had to rebuild my place each time. The outsider develops a particular form of attention. They notice what others have stopped seeing.
I used that sensitivity first to understand cultures that weren't mine. Then to help brands understand why they were becoming strangers to the people they were addressing.
What I'm trying to do is ultimately simple: help organisations become true again. Not more visible. Not louder. More humanly coherent.
Each case builds on the previous one. Reading them in order, from 2011 to 2023, is the only way to follow how the thinking developed.
For the first time, all the pieces came together. The subject was no longer just communication. Creativity was no longer an execution tool. It was becoming a diagnostic instrument. And it's precisely at that point that What Makes Us Human was born.
Read the full case →Garnier taught me what happens when a brand grows faster than its capacity to listen to the cultures it addresses. Coherence is not about speaking everywhere in the same way. It is about remaining culturally relevant everywhere you speak.
Read the full case →After learning to observe a city, I started observing a country. Becca taught me that cultural shifts become visible long before organisations have the language to describe them. That is where observation became interpretation.
Read the full case →New York taught me that cultures shape the people who live inside them. Behind the New York Attitude was a cultural reality far more complex than the brand's own discourse. That is where observation became a method of work.
Read the full case →Arriving in London without knowing the language or the codes forced me to develop a particular form of attention. Samsung taught me that a brand follows exactly the same path as a person arriving somewhere new: you don't join a culture by trying to change it. You start by observing it, then you learn to contribute.
Read the full case →Gen Z is different. The market has become harder. Consumers are less loyal than before. Competition is more aggressive. The economy is more uncertain. These explanations are sometimes right. But they often have one thing in common: they locate the problem outside the organisation.
Over time, I have noticed that the most significant shifts often appear elsewhere. They emerge when organisations become so close to their own systems that they end up reading the world through them.
This work tends to become useful when:
It's usually at that point that our conversations begin.
Most projects begin when a question becomes too important to ignore. Let's talk.